Archive for Concepts

Mar
02

2010 Porsche 918 Spyder Concept

Posted by: | Comments (0)

Porsche will present the 918 Spyder concept car at its world debut this evening in Geneva. This mid-engined two-seater combines the performance of a super-sports car with the CO2 emissions of a small compact, an innovative plug-in hybrid concept reducing emissions to just 70 grams CO2 per kilometre and fuel consumption to 3.0 litres/100 kilometres (94 mpg imp). Within this concept Porsche combines a V8 power unit delivering more than 500 hp and three electric motors with overall output of 160 kW.

2010 Porsche 918 Spyder Concept

2010 Porsche 918 Spyder Concept

Read More→

Categories : Articles, Concepts
Comments (0)

Mercedes-Benz’ F800 Style research vehicle is showing the future of premium automobiles from a new perspective, as the five-seat premium sedan combines highly efficient drive technologies with unparalleled safety and convenience features and an emotive design idiom, which interprets current Mercedes-Benz styling in line with the brand’s hallmark attribute of refined performance.

Mercedes F800 Concept - 2012 Mercedes CLS-Class

Mercedes F800 Concept - 2012 Mercedes CLS-Class

Read More→

Categories : Articles, Concepts
Comments (0)
Feb
03

Rails Is A Honda, Not An iPod

Posted by: | Comments (0)

Apple embraces open-source software, and yet – bizarrely – the company takes a notoriously hostile attitude to users who want to modify Apple products they buy. It took a class-action lawsuit and general outrage to get Steve Jobs to open up the iPhone to developers. If you want to change the battery on your iPod, you’re out of luck. It’s Steve’s way or the highway.

By contrast, the Honda enthusiast community has come up with more options, add-ons, and hacks - for lack of a better word

Based on my own completely unscientific survey of the Rails community, I’m basically certain that more of us own iPhones than heavily customized Hondas. But we ultimately have more in common with the Honda custom community than we do with the community Apple thought they were selling the iPhone to. The disparity between the community Apple thought they were selling to and the community they really were selling to is part of the set of misperceptions which led Apple to think shutting developers and users out of their iPhones wouldn’t be a big deal. An interesting topic – but the main thing here is what Rails users have in common with people who want their cars to glow in the dark.

Exhibit A is jRails, a Rails plugin which allows you to swap out all your Prototype and Scriptaculous JavaScript and replace it seamlessly with jQuery JavaScript instead. All your Rails JavaScript helpers remain intact, which means you can migrate from Prototype and Scriptaculous without changing a single line of Ruby code. All you have to change is your custom JavaScript – and that’s the whole point of the exercise, because some people prefer to write their custom JavaScript using jQuery.

Exhibit B is auto_migrations, a fantastic Rails plugin which hijacks the entire migrations system and, while keeping it intact, replaces the developer’s interface to it – a potentially sprawling mess of individual migration files – with one single, infinitely more elegant, self-migrating schema file.

The most important piece of evidence is Rails’ plugin architecture itself. The whole thing is designed so you can rebuild any piece of it any way you want to. Because he missed this fundamental idea, one Microsoft programmer wrote a post dissing Rails which seemed to almost dip into sheer insanity:

The Rails Team needs to accept that they are now a VENDOR, not radical mavericks.

I responded that Rails core isn’t a vendor because nobody’s giving them vendor money, and that if you want to change the framework, you’ve got a flexible plugin architecture and a powerful dynamic language which each make it very easy to do. He replied:

The core point of what you’re addressing here is that “just because people use it, doesn’t mean Rails has any responsibility to people” – I say that’s not so. But we could wave our arms all day about this, and really it comes down to what you’re willing to tolerate as a software provider.

Just think on it for a bit. Your livelihood (if you’re a Rails guy) is resting on this platform… you cool with that?

My opinion, of course, is that my livelihood rests on me, and always will, irrespective of Rails’ future, but that’s another question. I bring this up because what really caused the disagreement here was a fundamental difference of opinion on what the word “platform” means. Specifically, what kind of responsibility do you have to your users when you provide a platform? Is the way the user uses the platform your decision, or theirs? If you’re Apple, you believe that by providing a platform, you take responsibility for pretty much every aspect of the user’s experience on that platform. If you’re Honda, you take the attitude that if some wacko wants to make their car look like a spaceship, who are you to stop them?

Rails is a platform which is designed to be easy for newbies to get started with and easy for experts to transform, adapt, and bend to their wills.  If you want Rails to do something that Rails doesn’t do, you have two options: use something else, or make like Tim Allen back when he was funny and rewire that sucker. See what you can make it do


Categories : Articles, Concepts
Comments (0)

This concept is a modern interpretation of the Lamborghini Espada from the 60s.  The goal was to think of what could have been a GT Lamborghini with front centered engine (wish could be out in a very near future), and to compete with other models, such as the Mercedes McLaren SLR, the Aston Martin One 77 and the last Lexus LFA.

The design of this concept refers to the old Lamborghini Espada, but without falling into the neo retro style seen in recent Chevrolet Camaro and Ford Mustang.  We can indeed see references to modern Lamborghini with sharp lines inspired stealth fighter planes.

2009 Lamborghini Toro Concept Design of Amadou Ndiaye

2009 Lamborghini Toro Concept Design of Amadou Ndiaye

Read More→

Categories : Articles, Concepts
Comments (0)